Project Online Is Retiring: Should You Move to Project Server Subscription, or Look Beyond?
- Project Made Easy

- 21 hours ago
- 3 min read

With Project Online (POL) set to retire by late 2026, many organizations are at a crossroads. For years, POL has been the backbone of project and portfolio management for PMOs, but now, teams must decide what comes next.
For some, Project Server Subscription feels like the obvious next step. For others, this moment signals an opportunity to rethink their entire PPM strategy.
Before making a decision, it’s important to understand what Project Server Subscription offers, how it compares to Project Online, and whether it truly fits a future-ready PMO.
What Is Project Server Subscription?

Project Server Subscription is Microsoft’s subscription-based version of the traditional on-premises Project Server.
Unlike Project Online, which is fully cloud-hosted and managed by Microsoft, Project Server Subscription:
Is customer-hosted
Runs on your own infrastructure (or private cloud)
Requires integration with SharePoint Server and SQL Server
Is licensed via a subscription model, but still managed like an on-premises application
In simple terms, it offers familiar Project Server functionality, but with greater responsibility on your IT team.
Key Differences: Project Online vs. Project Server Subscription
For PMOs worried about losing core capabilities, the good news is that many familiar POL features still exist in Project Server Subscription, including:
Enterprise project scheduling and publishing
Resource management and capacity planning
Timesheets and task updates
Portfolio views and reporting
Integration with Microsoft Project Desktop
SharePoint-based collaboration and document management
From a functionality perspective, the experience will feel familiar to long-time Project Online users.
While features may look similar, the operating model is very different.
Project Online
Fully cloud-hosted by Microsoft
Automatic updates and patches
Minimal infrastructure management
Faster access to modern integrations
Project Server Subscription
Customer-managed infrastructure
Manual updates and upgrades
Greater reliance on IT resources
Limited flexibility compared to cloud-native platforms
This shift from a Microsoft-managed service to a customer-managed system is often underestimated and can significantly impact long-term effort and cost.
Technical Considerations Before Choosing Project Server Subscription
Moving to Project Server Subscription isn’t just a licensing decision; it’s a technical one.
PMOs and IT teams need to plan for:
Server provisioning and configuration
SharePoint Server setup and management
SQL Server performance and security
User access, authentication, and permissions
Backup, disaster recovery, and high availability
Testing and deploying upgrades
For organizations without strong internal IT support, these requirements can quickly become a challenge.
Application Maintenance and Support Responsibilities
With Project Server Subscription, application maintenance shifts entirely to you.
This includes:
Regular patching and updates
Monitoring system performance
Troubleshooting issues
Managing integrations
Ensuring uptime and data protection
What was once handled automatically in Project Online now becomes an ongoing operational responsibility, often requiring dedicated resources or external support partners.
Licensing and Total Cost Considerations
While Project Server Subscription uses a subscription model, licensing is only part of the picture.
Organizations should consider:
Server and CAL licensing
SharePoint and SQL Server costs
Infrastructure hosting expenses
Ongoing maintenance and support costs
Upgrade and testing efforts
Over time, the total cost of ownership can be significantly higher than expected, especially when compared to modern cloud PPM solutions.
Is Project Server Subscription a Long-Term Strategy?
Project Server Subscription can work well as a short-term continuation for organizations deeply invested in the Microsoft Project ecosystem.
However, many PMOs are asking important questions:
Does this align with our cloud-first strategy?
Will this scale with our evolving delivery models?
Are we investing in the future, or maintaining the past?
For many, the POL retirement is less about replacing a tool and more about modernizing how work is managed.
Looking Ahead: Choose Solutions Built for the Future
As PMOs plan life after Project Online, this moment presents a powerful opportunity, not just to migrate, but to improve.
Modern, cloud-native platforms offer:
Easier maintenance
Faster innovation
Better integrations
Improved user adoption
Lower operational overhead
Consider solutions that are built for the future, like Fluid PPM.
Fluid PPM delivers enterprise-grade portfolio management without the complexity of legacy systems, helping PMOs move forward with confidence.
Final Thought
Project Online’s retirement is a turning point. Whether you choose Project Server Subscription or explore modern alternatives, the most important step is making an informed, future-ready decision.
If you’re already planning the next chapter, make sure it’s built to last.


Comments